Traffic tickets, accidents, insurance Discuss legal issues, emissions testing, illegal modifications, etc....

Redlight Camera

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20-Jun-2009, 02:44 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
weezybaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 612
Redlight Camera

It was raining out and I was going the speed limit and the light turned yellow on me just as I passed. The cars were slowing down infront of me to get onto the highway ( on ramp is just after the lights) so I had to slow down before I cleared the intersection and all I saw was a big flash that lit up the whole intersection in my rear view mirror.

What happens next?
weezybaby is offline  
Old 20-Jun-2009, 02:52 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
nitescream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 24
they will review the picture and if deemed out of your control and so on nothing will happen. but if deemed you should drove according to the conditions you will get a ticket with pic car and plates in the mail..... think of it as a HUG parking ticket cause it dont affect you, just the plates.
nitescream is offline  
Old 20-Jun-2009, 03:11 PM
  #3  
-- site donator --
 
DumbasSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,647
Are you sure it wa s ared light camera and not someones headlights or something?

The registered owner of the licence plates will get the ticket. There are no points and its close to $200 here in Hamilton, but that might also depend on the city you got the ticket in. As with any other ticket, Im sure you could fight it.
DumbasSi is offline  
Old 31-Aug-2009, 01:11 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
ImperialCivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 29
It is nearly impossible to win a red light camera ticket. They only send you a ticket after reviewing it and taking two pictures of you crossing the red light with a clear shot of your license plate. The owner of the plates will get the ticket, regardless of who is driving. Better off just paying the fine and getting on with your life.
ImperialCivic is offline  
Old 15-Sep-2009, 10:34 AM
  #5  
Member
 
v-tech hb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 39
Originally Posted by ImperialCivic
It is nearly impossible to win a red light camera ticket. They only send you a ticket after reviewing it and taking two pictures of you crossing the red light with a clear shot of your license plate. The owner of the plates will get the ticket, regardless of who is driving. Better off just paying the fine and getting on with your life.

i got red light camera ticket like 3 years ago, it was $190, i paid around $120 to the ticket fighter, and it's gone, no point, no record.....

they also told me it's even more easier to win compare u get caught by the cops....anyone can comfirm this?
v-tech hb is offline  
Old 15-Sep-2009, 10:43 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
FiveO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by v-tech hb
i got red light camera ticket like 3 years ago, it was $190, i paid around $120 to the ticket fighter, and it's gone, no point, no record.....

they also told me it's even more easier to win compare u get caught by the cops....anyone can comfirm this?
Even if you straight up plead guilty, red light camera convictions do not result in demerit points, note on your driving record, or insurance increases anyways.

As for being easier to win, most JPs take the automated cameras as being reliable event recorders right up on par with radar. It's not that easy to fight a red light camera ticket.
FiveO is offline  
Old 15-Sep-2009, 10:47 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Polkaroo Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fortress of Superheroes
Posts: 7,275
I think red light camera's would cause more accidents than prevent. I hate it when people slam their brakes on an amber light because they know that intersection has a red light camera, and I almost end up rear ending them. Since on any other intersection they would have just went through.

Red light cameras FTL.
Polkaroo Killa is offline  
Old 15-Sep-2009, 11:01 AM
  #8  
Member
 
champek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: barrie/burlington
Posts: 62
180 bux in the hammer lol i just got one same thing happend to me lol it was raining
champek is offline  
Old 15-Sep-2009, 11:07 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Polkaroo Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fortress of Superheroes
Posts: 7,275
Originally Posted by champek
180 bux in the hammer lol i just got one same thing happend to me lol it was raining
It's just another stupid money grab for the gov't.
Polkaroo Killa is offline  
Old 15-Sep-2009, 11:15 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
FiveO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by Polkaroo Killa
I think red light camera's would cause more accidents than prevent. I hate it when people slam their brakes on an amber light because they know that intersection has a red light camera, and I almost end up rear ending them. Since on any other intersection they would have just went through.

Red light cameras FTL.

Yeah, in some places thay have actually raised the crash rates of camera-controlled intersections.

The difference is in the nature of crashes. Fewer serious T-bone crashes versus the same or slightly higher numbers of comparatively minor rear-end collisions.

T-bone crashes often result in serious injury or death because cars simply do not have enough crush space to offer significant high-speed side-impact crash protection.

Rear-end collisions at camera-controlled intersections usually result in little more than bruised wallets. Besides, those rear-end collisions are less the fault of the camera and more the fault of a driver following too close and not paying adequate attention anyways.

Given the available choices, for overall safety I'd take the red light camera any day.

Besides, don't you know? If you can stop safely, you're supposed to treat the amber as a red anyways. More particularly, the car behind you should certainly treat that amber as a red and prepare to stop anyways, and not assume that they can cruise through the amber right behind you.
FiveO is offline  
Old 15-Sep-2009, 12:04 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Polkaroo Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Fortress of Superheroes
Posts: 7,275
Originally Posted by FiveO
Yeah, in some places thay have actually raised the crash rates of camera-controlled intersections.

The difference is in the nature of crashes. Fewer serious T-bone crashes versus the same or slightly higher numbers of comparatively minor rear-end collisions.

T-bone crashes often result in serious injury or death because cars simply do not have enough crush space to offer significant high-speed side-impact crash protection.

Rear-end collisions at camera-controlled intersections usually result in little more than bruised wallets. Besides, those rear-end collisions are less the fault of the camera and more the fault of a driver following too close and not paying adequate attention anyways.

Given the available choices, for overall safety I'd take the red light camera any day.

Besides, don't you know? If you can stop safely, you're supposed to treat the amber as a red anyways. More particularly, the car behind you should certainly treat that amber as a red and prepare to stop anyways, and not assume that they can cruise through the amber right behind you.
The amber light to me means to gun it and make it before it turns red. I know where my point of no return is, that's the difference.
Polkaroo Killa is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
szuberi
Photographer's Corner
19
24-Nov-2007 10:01 PM
xxSLiMxx
Media - Non-Car Related
5
15-Nov-2007 03:20 PM
xxSLiMxx
Media - Non-Car Related
3
12-Nov-2007 07:59 PM
Double B
Photographer's Corner
3
29-Oct-2007 08:35 PM
bbarbulo
CFz Discussion
24
25-Oct-2007 07:34 PM



Quick Reply: Redlight Camera



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 AM.