Driving on highway with high RPM = Bad?
18-Feb-2003, 08:52 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by gatherer
come on a almost stock cx hatchback (I've decided not to go through the effort of replacing my intake which is the only power mod on the car) against the stock CRV... I'll even throw in my lack of experince driving down the 1/4 mile (never done it beforehow hard can it be?)
come on a almost stock cx hatchback (I've decided not to go through the effort of replacing my intake which is the only power mod on the car) against the stock CRV... I'll even throw in my lack of experince driving down the 1/4 mile (never done it beforehow hard can it be?)
CR-V
160 HP 6000
162 lbs/ft Torque @ 6200
Can't forget i-VTEC at 4500 RPM
On some site it shows the CR-V will beat the Civic.
18-Feb-2003, 09:00 PM
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: on a race track
Posts: 17,846
Originally posted by AzimuthX
In the summer time we can try it out 1 time, put the pedal to the metal on an auto! We can but that means someone with G must tag along.
CR-V
160 HP 6000
162 lbs/ft Torque @ 6200
Can't forget i-VTEC at 4500 RPM
On some site it shows the CR-V will beat the Civic.
In the summer time we can try it out 1 time, put the pedal to the metal on an auto! We can but that means someone with G must tag along.
CR-V
160 HP 6000
162 lbs/ft Torque @ 6200
Can't forget i-VTEC at 4500 RPM
On some site it shows the CR-V will beat the Civic.
18-Feb-2003, 09:37 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by gatherer
I hope your talking about at the track...
I hope your talking about at the track...
Year 2002
Make Honda
Model CR-V
Trim EX
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 111 mph
Limited Top Speed
0-30 mph 2.10 s
0-40 mph 4.20 s
0-50 mph 5.90 s
0-60 mph 8.80 s
0-70 mph 11.90 s
0-80 mph 15.70 s
0-90 mph 22.20 s
0-100 mph 31.80 s
100 ft 3.10 s
500 ft 8.70 s
1320 ft (1/4 mile) 16.50 s @ 81.7 mph
Parts & Accessories Honda CR-V
Notes Hard launch was a clutch-dump at 6000 RPM.
Make Honda
Model CR-V
Trim EX
Transmission 5-speed Manual
Theoretical Top Speed 111 mph
Limited Top Speed
0-30 mph 2.10 s
0-40 mph 4.20 s
0-50 mph 5.90 s
0-60 mph 8.80 s
0-70 mph 11.90 s
0-80 mph 15.70 s
0-90 mph 22.20 s
0-100 mph 31.80 s
100 ft 3.10 s
500 ft 8.70 s
1320 ft (1/4 mile) 16.50 s @ 81.7 mph
Parts & Accessories Honda CR-V
Notes Hard launch was a clutch-dump at 6000 RPM.
16.5
2000 Civic Si (Thats the SiR Coupe)
15.9 So thats not what I call Dinner...
2003 Civic Si (Thats the SiR HB)
16.1 Wow, can you see CR-V not bad with a Civic SiR that has similar engine but with a lot more weight.
1996 Civic EX Coupe (Thats the Si)
16.7 W00t!
1996 Civic EX Sedan (I think thats LX Sedan)
17.4 W00t!
2003 Pilot
16.4 Not bad... Pilot definately has a lot more power.
Let the betting begin!
18-Feb-2003, 10:28 PM
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: JAV depot
Posts: 373
haha, so the numbers are not valid, race an SUV with AT? Even my 3 yr old cousin is laughing.
also, one more thing
the 0.6 seconds differential between SiR and CRV is a BIG dinner
0.6 seconds is about 20 to 25 meters of distance at the finish line
In plain English for 15 yr old can understand:
The SiR can smoke the CRV by at least 4 car length.
also, one more thing
the 0.6 seconds differential between SiR and CRV is a BIG dinner
0.6 seconds is about 20 to 25 meters of distance at the finish line
In plain English for 15 yr old can understand:
The SiR can smoke the CRV by at least 4 car length.
18-Feb-2003, 10:45 PM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Oh gawd once I found out V33K was posting it was going to be flame again.
Since NoSpleeny mentioned 2002 I suppose he is referring to the 2002 SiR HB as well which is .1 second faster than the CR-V. But look the CR-V has alot more weight with a slightly larger engine (.4 litres, larger bore/stroke = more torque). So I guess the CR-V rape a 96 honda sedan if .6 is a lot.
If you don't want to read than don't post! If you can find AT results sure go post them up here but for the time being these data are from MT.
Since NoSpleeny mentioned 2002 I suppose he is referring to the 2002 SiR HB as well which is .1 second faster than the CR-V. But look the CR-V has alot more weight with a slightly larger engine (.4 litres, larger bore/stroke = more torque). So I guess the CR-V rape a 96 honda sedan if .6 is a lot.
If you don't want to read than don't post! If you can find AT results sure go post them up here but for the time being these data are from MT.
19-Feb-2003, 08:25 AM
#33
-- site donator --
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: THE OAK
Posts: 10,423
Originally posted by v33k
AzimuthX, go **** yourself
if you need a dick, borrow your dad's
Get a ******* life and get the **** out of here, go play your stupid gameboy or something
You don't even ******* know how to drive and you talk **** here?
**** off buddy.
AzimuthX, go **** yourself
if you need a dick, borrow your dad's
Get a ******* life and get the **** out of here, go play your stupid gameboy or something
You don't even ******* know how to drive and you talk **** here?
**** off buddy.
Welcome back Potty Mouth .... I see you were able to remove your head out of your *** just enough to post ......
do me a favour keep it clean or post it in a pm . either way do me favour and play a lot nicer
19-Feb-2003, 08:29 AM
#34
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Markham
Posts: 30
Welcome back Potty Mouth .... I see you were able to remove your head out of your *** just enough to post ......
do me a favour keep it clean or post it in a pm . either way do me favour and play a lot nicer
do me a favour keep it clean or post it in a pm . either way do me favour and play a lot nicer
Nice to see some good site Administration.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
imported_Mattds
Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion
2
04-Jun-2007 11:33 PM
