Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion Engine tech, forced induction, springs, shocks, brakes, tires, etc.

blue smoke

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13-Jan-2003, 11:05 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
NoSpleeny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Etobicoke
Posts: 3,662
I think somebody has a lot of time on their hands THanks for the info!

I'm gonna print that out and leave it in my car!
NoSpleeny is offline  
Old 14-Jan-2003, 11:50 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
T-Shirt Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 3,193
LOL I like the Back to Top in the post

I'm getting like 300kms per tank too, Is octane a factor in fuel consumption? Cause I always get 91-94 octane, but I still get horrible consumption all year round, even the one time I did all highway kms (360kms).

I've swapped plugs, changed the air filter etc... Think I should swap the distributer and spark plug wires? Think that'll help? Cause I don't know if theyve ever been changed, what do the original wires say on em? TIA

Greg
T-Shirt Ninja is offline  
Old 14-Jan-2003, 12:06 PM
  #23  
-- site donator --
iTrader: (2)
 
bbarbulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: not Toronto
Posts: 27,687
Poor fuel economy is not a sign of an ignition related problem grego9198. Changing those parts *may* be a good idea, but will not reduce fuel consumption. Yes, if your engine is close to stock, and your timing is set properly, you are wasting your money on premium gas. It is less volatile and thus harder to light, which means no detonation, but also slower burn rates. Stick with 87 like Honda says unless your car is highly modified to the point of detonation. Your problem could be anything from the O2 sensor to a loose vaccuum line to a faulty press regulator. That is in fact if it is a problem at all...calculate your fuel mileage for 3 weeks, and then compare to EPA estimates of an as-new Civic in 1994. If you are more than 50 kms off the mark, but you don't drive like an ***, then your car likely has fueling issues and will require diagnosis.
bbarbulo is offline  
Old 14-Jan-2003, 04:22 PM
  #24  
AzimuthX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
So my dad is wasting $ on Ultra 94 @ Sunoco for filling up the 2002 CR-V, and before, the 92 Camry?

I knew that already, but can't convince him.
 
Old 14-Jan-2003, 04:26 PM
  #25  
-- site donator --
iTrader: (2)
 
bbarbulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: not Toronto
Posts: 27,687
Originally posted by AzimuthX
So my dad is wasting $ on Ultra 94 @ Sunoco for filling up the 2002 CR-V, and before, the 92 Camry?

I knew that already, but can't convince him.
Whatever it says on the manual....if it's tuned for 87 octane, use that. Higher octane prevents detonation cause it doesn't burn as easily, but when it burns, it burns at a higher caloric value. If you wanna convince him, search the web, I've seen tones of articles on this issue. Usually only turbo and high-compression cars require ultra gas. Like a WRX, VR6 VW, Prelude, GS-R, etc. Not likely that your CR-V uses it. Also check howstuffworks.com
bbarbulo is offline  
Old 14-Jan-2003, 05:53 PM
  #26  
AzimuthX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Its kind of hard changing his mind on Ultra 94, anything else maybe but not online sources regarding this. Oh well not my prob . It does say 86 or higher...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HHK06
Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion
7
14-Jul-2006 11:31 AM
Civic Chick 69
Honda Civic (+ other) Parts/Accessories for Sale or Trade
3
30-Nov-2005 02:24 AM
DanielM
Honda Civic (+ other) Parts/Accessories for Sale or Trade
1
10-Sep-2005 02:01 AM
Carbon_Cusco_SI
Honda Civic (+ other) Parts/Accessories for Sale or Trade
3
07-Aug-2004 07:03 PM
breezkid
Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion
8
08-Jun-2004 11:24 AM



Quick Reply: blue smoke



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.