F 9/11 - Whose seen it?
#23
Hitler and Stalin werent that bad? I think I may be misunderstanding your post so I won't jump to conclusions right away..
Did you mean to say like compared to the u.s. plan it makes stalin and hitler look not as bad or ?? elaborate please.
Did you mean to say like compared to the u.s. plan it makes stalin and hitler look not as bad or ?? elaborate please.
#26
another film in a similar vein is the killing fields that documents what the U.s. did in Cambodia during the vietnam war, its ver well done. And what about the film is bull****, besides the fact that Moore puts a bit of a comedic spin on some of the issues and sort of compares bush to an old cowboy, all of his points are supported with facts
#29
#30
Dan long time no talk! Hit me up on msn.
**Possible Spoilers for those who haven't seen it **
I saw the movie a couple of days ago, eh, it was alrite.
No way I'd ever call it a "documentary" though.
The only points of view Moore expressed, were the ones that he wanted to portray.
It was purely one sided, and a lot of comments/interviews were taken out of context. Sure Bush is an idiot, and I don't agree with his policies, but all Moore did in this movie was take footage of him being and idiot, tried to tie it into a plot and bam I'm $14 cheaper.
It had no real flow, and what really disappointed me was the fact that they did not get into the fact that Bush knew about the attacks before they came. If he had found some good info, and explained that better, it would have made the movie alot beter, imo.
Basically is was, oh in August, Bush saw a "report" (then it shows him getting a piece of paper, which could've said anything) so, big deal, go into more detail!
Although all of his movies are clearly biased towards his point of view, I did not enjoy this one as much as his others, and found it to drag on and on.
Oh and how many times can you say bin laden an saudi in one movie?
**Possible Spoilers for those who haven't seen it **
I saw the movie a couple of days ago, eh, it was alrite.
No way I'd ever call it a "documentary" though.
The only points of view Moore expressed, were the ones that he wanted to portray.
It was purely one sided, and a lot of comments/interviews were taken out of context. Sure Bush is an idiot, and I don't agree with his policies, but all Moore did in this movie was take footage of him being and idiot, tried to tie it into a plot and bam I'm $14 cheaper.
It had no real flow, and what really disappointed me was the fact that they did not get into the fact that Bush knew about the attacks before they came. If he had found some good info, and explained that better, it would have made the movie alot beter, imo.
Basically is was, oh in August, Bush saw a "report" (then it shows him getting a piece of paper, which could've said anything) so, big deal, go into more detail!
Although all of his movies are clearly biased towards his point of view, I did not enjoy this one as much as his others, and found it to drag on and on.
Oh and how many times can you say bin laden an saudi in one movie?
#31
Originally posted by JohnnyToronto
It had no real flow, and what really disappointed me was the fact that they did not get into the fact that Bush knew about the attacks before they came. If he had found some good info, and explained that better, it would have made the movie alot beter, imo.
It had no real flow, and what really disappointed me was the fact that they did not get into the fact that Bush knew about the attacks before they came. If he had found some good info, and explained that better, it would have made the movie alot beter, imo.
so he did make that connection.....
Originally posted by JohnnyToronto
Oh and how many times can you say bin laden an saudi in one movie?
Oh and how many times can you say bin laden an saudi in one movie?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post