Going Turbo!!!!! YEAH!!!!
#21
man wowow dont' use yoru stock injectors and rremove the filter screens''??.. go to the junk yard and grab 450 cc talon injectors (blue tops) to go with yoru afc retard your timing and get it tuned. I mean 6-8 psi on yoru setup woudl probobly get 150-170 whp maybe. then you will need a clutch casue that will fry your stocker.
#22
Originally posted by Dr.K
And with that Built D you get Poor Gearing, Garbage Tranny,Unequal length driveshaft's and a head that flow's less. But hey. To each is his own. People will alway's try to be different.I guess some people think its fun to try and prove they can be better/faster with Inferior ****. Thats Great, Were proud of you determined folks. Your Hero Cookie is in the Mail.
And with that Built D you get Poor Gearing, Garbage Tranny,Unequal length driveshaft's and a head that flow's less. But hey. To each is his own. People will alway's try to be different.I guess some people think its fun to try and prove they can be better/faster with Inferior ****. Thats Great, Were proud of you determined folks. Your Hero Cookie is in the Mail.
#23
yeah your right i think ill grab the talons injectors and do that. Don't worry about the clutch it was replaced with an exedy clutch like a month ago so that'll hold for a while.... The set-up will be going in a few weeks maybe on 4th of july weekend if all the parts come in before friday.... Anyways ill post pics and any problems ill run into.. hopefully i can get the talons injectors this week at a local junkyard...
#24
Originally posted by bbarbulo
I'm curious, what kinda numbers do you post on the dyno since you feel so qualified to talk ****?
I'm curious, what kinda numbers do you post on the dyno since you feel so qualified to talk ****?
#26
Well Bbarbulo...I made 135 at the wheel's with my B16 with SRI,Header's and a Chip. But that was with my stock CX exhuast.Im dyno'ing it again this week .D turbo's make what?..170-190whp when done properly? Hell you could make that with just a set of Cam's and bolt on's in a B16. D turbo's are only Cost effective if you can do all the work yourself and obtain the part's for Dirt cheap. But when its all Said and done you might as well have started with a B18A. There inexpensive and much more durable since they were a performance motor to begin with.
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
#27
Originally posted by Dr.K
Well Bbarbulo...I made 135 at the wheel's with my B16 with SRI,Header's and a Chip. But that was with my stock CX exhuast.Im dyno'ing it again this week .D turbo's make what?..170-190whp when done properly? Hell you could make that with just a set of Cam's and bolt on's in a B16. D turbo's are only Cost effective if you can do all the work yourself and obtain the part's for Dirt cheap. But when its all Said and done you might as well have started with a B18A. There inexpensive and much more durable since they were a performance motor to begin with.
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
Well Bbarbulo...I made 135 at the wheel's with my B16 with SRI,Header's and a Chip. But that was with my stock CX exhuast.Im dyno'ing it again this week .D turbo's make what?..170-190whp when done properly? Hell you could make that with just a set of Cam's and bolt on's in a B16. D turbo's are only Cost effective if you can do all the work yourself and obtain the part's for Dirt cheap. But when its all Said and done you might as well have started with a B18A. There inexpensive and much more durable since they were a performance motor to begin with.
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
#28
Originally posted by Dr.K
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
#29
Originally posted by Dr.K
Well Bbarbulo...I made 135 at the wheel's with my B16 with SRI,Header's and a Chip. But that was with my stock CX exhuast.Im dyno'ing it again this week .D turbo's make what?..170-190whp when done properly? Hell you could make that with just a set of Cam's and bolt on's in a B16. D turbo's are only Cost effective if you can do all the work yourself and obtain the part's for Dirt cheap. But when its all Said and done you might as well have started with a B18A. There inexpensive and much more durable since they were a performance motor to begin with.
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
Well Bbarbulo...I made 135 at the wheel's with my B16 with SRI,Header's and a Chip. But that was with my stock CX exhuast.Im dyno'ing it again this week .D turbo's make what?..170-190whp when done properly? Hell you could make that with just a set of Cam's and bolt on's in a B16. D turbo's are only Cost effective if you can do all the work yourself and obtain the part's for Dirt cheap. But when its all Said and done you might as well have started with a B18A. There inexpensive and much more durable since they were a performance motor to begin with.
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
#30
Originally posted by Dr.K
Well Bbarbulo...I made 135 at the wheel's with my B16 with SRI,Header's and a Chip. But that was with my stock CX exhuast.Im dyno'ing it again this week .D turbo's make what?..170-190whp when done properly? Hell you could make that with just a set of Cam's and bolt on's in a B16. D turbo's are only Cost effective if you can do all the work yourself and obtain the part's for Dirt cheap. But when its all Said and done you might as well have started with a B18A. There inexpensive and much more durable since they were a performance motor to begin with.
Well Bbarbulo...I made 135 at the wheel's with my B16 with SRI,Header's and a Chip. But that was with my stock CX exhuast.Im dyno'ing it again this week .D turbo's make what?..170-190whp when done properly? Hell you could make that with just a set of Cam's and bolt on's in a B16. D turbo's are only Cost effective if you can do all the work yourself and obtain the part's for Dirt cheap. But when its all Said and done you might as well have started with a B18A. There inexpensive and much more durable since they were a performance motor to begin with.
the other thing is, the only limitation of boost is your wallet. the first limitation of normal aspiration is volumetric efficiency. .... and then displacement, and then your wallet.
with boost, if you sleeve the block, you can safely make 400 hp. And sleeving and building the block will still come in at about the same price as a type R swap would stock.... except it'll make about 300 whp for fun... hell there are even stock blocks making 300 whp.
you'll never see that kinda power from an NA four cylinder (ok maybe, the BTCC Accord with the reverse head H22A made about 300 crank hp, but that's an all out race car.)
#31
ya i was b16civic so lets go duke it out!! i have nothing against special k but i have fun making fun of him for some reason....oh yeah...stupid sh*t always appear in his posts. all kidding aside, i know what the hell im talking about from experience not the internet so when i see stupid stuff i say something.
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Dr.K
Well Bbarbulo...I made 135 at the wheel's with my B16 with SRI,Header's and a Chip. But that was with my stock CX exhuast.Im dyno'ing it again this week .D turbo's make what?..170-190whp when done properly? Hell you could make that with just a set of Cam's and bolt on's in a B16. D turbo's are only Cost effective if you can do all the work yourself and obtain the part's for Dirt cheap. But when its all Said and done you might as well have started with a B18A. There inexpensive and much more durable since they were a performance motor to begin with.
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
Well Bbarbulo...I made 135 at the wheel's with my B16 with SRI,Header's and a Chip. But that was with my stock CX exhuast.Im dyno'ing it again this week .D turbo's make what?..170-190whp when done properly? Hell you could make that with just a set of Cam's and bolt on's in a B16. D turbo's are only Cost effective if you can do all the work yourself and obtain the part's for Dirt cheap. But when its all Said and done you might as well have started with a B18A. There inexpensive and much more durable since they were a performance motor to begin with.
And SteveL what the **** do you have to Bring to this convo? Sure me and BBarbulo are arguing but at least he make's valid point's. Even though we disagree I still respect his oppinion. Its a simple argument about Engine's on a car Forum. What the **** do YOU have under YOUR Hood? Can you talk ****?. Id love to see your Engine at the next meet. Come talk to me. Better yet race me. Lets both Roll to the Next Cayuga meet when the Club is going. If all I do is read **** and talk **** then you should have no problems beating my slow *** civic.
#34
It jsut pisses me off when People blaze you up but Provide no additional info to the Argument. If you said....."D's are better because ____________ and your an Idiot" Than Fine. It jsut seems juvenile when someone blazes but Provide's no input and neither agree's nor Disagree's.
And I called someone on who own's a shop? Stupid me. Either way I'll still race you. Next time the Club goes to Cayuga. If you got a hectic 2.0 litre than talk all the **** you want. You SHOULD be able to wreck me by a few car length's at least.I'll still battle. I dont' give a ****. And if the Club's not going I'll still show up to race you.
And I called someone on who own's a shop? Stupid me. Either way I'll still race you. Next time the Club goes to Cayuga. If you got a hectic 2.0 litre than talk all the **** you want. You SHOULD be able to wreck me by a few car length's at least.I'll still battle. I dont' give a ****. And if the Club's not going I'll still show up to race you.
#35
#37
#39
I'm sure we all have better things to do than to settle petty internet differences. I wouldn't waste my time, that's for sure. I built a car so I can enjoy it, not so I can prove something to someone.... and I'm sure Steve did the same.
#40
Originally posted by Dr.K
It jsut pisses me off when People blaze you up but Provide no additional info to the Argument. If you said....."D's are better because ____________ and your an Idiot" Than Fine. It jsut seems juvenile when someone blazes but Provide's no input and neither agree's nor Disagree's.
And I called someone on who own's a shop? Stupid me. Either way I'll still race you. Next time the Club goes to Cayuga. If you got a hectic 2.0 litre than talk all the **** you want. You SHOULD be able to wreck me by a few car length's at least.I'll still battle. I dont' give a ****. And if the Club's not going I'll still show up to race you.
It jsut pisses me off when People blaze you up but Provide no additional info to the Argument. If you said....."D's are better because ____________ and your an Idiot" Than Fine. It jsut seems juvenile when someone blazes but Provide's no input and neither agree's nor Disagree's.
And I called someone on who own's a shop? Stupid me. Either way I'll still race you. Next time the Club goes to Cayuga. If you got a hectic 2.0 litre than talk all the **** you want. You SHOULD be able to wreck me by a few car length's at least.I'll still battle. I dont' give a ****. And if the Club's not going I'll still show up to race you.
What does "blaze you up" mean? I've never heard that slang before. Are you smokin a blunt right now?