Engine Ask all your tech questions about engines here

Camshaft Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-Apr-2007, 11:48 AM
  #41  
-- site donator --
iTrader: (1)
 
zeeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: the hammer
Posts: 7,040
Originally posted by VTEC_Thunder
Some of what you said contracdicts other things you have said.

At one point you say "stage 2/3/4 cams are not worth it unless you go big" then you say skunk2 stage 2 cams are a great start at making good power on a stock engine (with springs/retainers of course).
From my understanding Skunk2 stage2 is basically just ITR non vtec lobes with a juiced up vtec lobe...pretty much any dohc vtec engine can run ITR cams pretty good.....and i was more referrring to a 1.8L anyways.
But would i put skunk2 stage 2s in a stock b16 and expect miracles....no, b16a don't like huge cams (generally) unless they have lots of work done (go big), so my statement of stage 2/3/4 cams not being worth it unless you go big makes sense. But there are exceptions to that statement. Like BC3+'s, they're a pretty good cam to toss into a relatively stock ITR (but keep in mind and ITR already has at least 11:1 CR, a good intake manifold and throttle body, good header and flows decent)


Originally posted by VTEC_Thunder
So please explain to me:

What is the difference in the cam stages and are the stages different from one brand to another? (like is a skunk2 stage 2 cam the same as another brands stage 1 cam (just as an example))?
Well the bigger the stage the bigger the cam (generally).
Every brand of cam is different though.
A stage 2 cam from skunk2 can be quite different from a stage 2 cam from crower.
It just means that crowers stage 1 cam would be smaller than their stage 2 cam, and their stage 3 cams would be bigger than their stage 2 cam.
But to compare a stage 2 cam from skunk2 to say crane's stage 2, you could notice that the lift/duration of the two are quite different.
zeeman is offline  
Old 11-Apr-2007, 02:45 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
4doorcivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mississauga
Posts: 55
i got a b20b i realy want to put cams in it I WAS TOLD that LS cams are good for this motor cheap and will make some more power is this truee or eny one recamend a mild shaft like a stage 1 or something because i dont plan on keeping this motor long
4doorcivic is offline  
Old 11-Apr-2007, 02:49 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Nova_Dust's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 18,367
Based on the spec, B20B cams perform slighly better than B18B (LS) cams.
Nova_Dust is offline  
Old 11-Apr-2007, 03:18 PM
  #44  
-- site donator --
iTrader: (1)
 
zeeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: the hammer
Posts: 7,040
i wouldn't put LS cams in b20, if ur not keeping it long, why spend money on it?
zeeman is offline  
Old 11-Apr-2007, 06:33 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
VTEC_Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Where ever my car is...
Posts: 1,393
Thanks for the info zeeman.

But you didn't answer my other question "which cams would your recommend for getting 180whp from a b16?" (anyone can chime in here....looking for some opinions...)
VTEC_Thunder is offline  
Old 11-Apr-2007, 06:50 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
LEITNER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: At your moms
Posts: 2,633
ctr cams dude...you cant go wrong....and bump your compression to 11.5:1
LEITNER is offline  
Old 11-Apr-2007, 07:00 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
VTEC_Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Where ever my car is...
Posts: 1,393
Originally posted by LEITNER
ctr cams dude...you cant go wrong....and bump your compression to 11.5:1
Thanks for the reply..

I forgot to mention, I won't be changing the pistons or anything in the stock bottom end. Just head work and tuning.

Is there a special thinner gasket you can buy that will slightly increase your compression? I know you can get thicker gaskets to decrease the compression, but wasn't sure if there were any that are thinner than stock thickness...
VTEC_Thunder is offline  
Old 11-Apr-2007, 08:18 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
LEITNER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: At your moms
Posts: 2,633
cut the head .033" and you should be around 11.2:1. advancing the cam gears 1-2 degrees should bring you back to stock cam timing...but dyno tuning is important to get it right...
LEITNER is offline  
Old 11-Apr-2007, 10:08 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
4doorcivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mississauga
Posts: 55
what cams would be best for the b20b in a ef civic ... im gona drive it this summer soo i need some *****
4doorcivic is offline  
Old 12-Apr-2007, 08:55 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
dingus888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 261
crower 403's with a nice header

180 whp on ctr cams in a b16 I dont' think that is possible maybe 150-160 whp with a sweet header and good tune maybe 160-170 with sweet header IM TB tuned very well

180 whp in a b16 will be hard....umm ls crank and rods with S2s2's or similar cam would be easier with b16 stamped on the block
dingus888 is offline  
Old 13-Apr-2007, 01:39 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
LEITNER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: At your moms
Posts: 2,633
Originally posted by dingus888
crower 403's with a nice header

180 whp on ctr cams in a b16 I dont' think that is possible maybe 150-160 whp with a sweet header and good tune maybe 160-170 with sweet header IM TB tuned very well

180 whp in a b16 will be hard....umm ls crank and rods with S2s2's or similar cam would be easier with b16 stamped on the block
clearly dude you dont know anything if your recommending the ls set up in the b16...just stupid on every level. and it was type r cams not ctr cams and i couldnt care less how hard you think it is thats the figures he got.
LEITNER is offline  
Old 13-Apr-2007, 11:41 AM
  #52  
-- site donator --
iTrader: (1)
 
zeeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: the hammer
Posts: 7,040
180whp in a b16 will be hard?!?!?!?
So i guess omniman is some sort of magician to hit 200WHP on a b16 eh.

Steve:
I think he was talking about using the 403s in the b20b that 4doorcivic was talking about.

I wouldn't use the LS crank in a b16, the pistons you have to use are crap apparently, i believe its b/c the piston pin has to be akwardly placed causing the oil control rings not to seal properly or something like that. But i've heard/seen nothing but bad things about the pistons you need to use when using the LS crank in a b16.
If you want to use a LS crank, use a LS block, their dirt cheap and very plentiful. I'd take b16 pistons in a LS block over a LS crank/rods in a b16 anyday.
zeeman is offline  
Old 14-Apr-2007, 10:15 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Mugen Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 537
Originally posted by zeeman
180whp in a b16 will be hard?!?!?!?
So i guess omniman is some sort of magician to hit 200WHP on a b16 eh.
to a certain extent, yes he is........ his 200whp build actually hit 195whp ish on one dyno and then 201whp or so on another. his set up was not fancy, but precise. Omni knows what works. i personally love B16's, and there have been many people that claim to make in the neighbourhood of 200whp at 1595, but, in actuality, those said b16's ended up making 160-180whp. there are only a handful of 200whp 1595 B16's on the planet. the problem is, most people think its easy to hit 200whp. trust me, even at 1820 cc's and 87.2, 200whp (on a dynojet) with a less than stellar header its difficult. now imagine how hard that is from 1.6L. the only real aid in making xxxwhp out of a 16 is RPM (hello r/s ratio). what its configuration, the 16 can make up the difference (whp) through rpm. and even then, its still not going to make any tq...........200whp (with no tricks i.e. aiming air filters above the floor of the plenum, removing air filter, open header, no cat etc) is harder to achieve than people think.

i mean, isn't it funny that Omni is the only one (pretty much) that proves he can make near 200whp out of 1595? i've yet to see anybody on a dynojet make 190whp+ out of the 16. every dyno i've seen close to that number, are on dynopacks. i remember Omni made 192whp on Roger Foo's EG, with a bone stock jdm b16 shortblock, S2S1 cams, SMS header, worked and milled head and Comptech ice box. absolutely sick
Mugen Power is offline  
Old 14-Apr-2007, 06:24 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
dingus888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 261
^^^thankyou 200 whp in a b16 would be very hard I have yet to see it done other thans omni's which woudl have a best flowing head ever with the best cam port header combo. 180 whp in a b16 is very hard on a stock head and bottom end I dont' understand how you think ctr cams with a stock block head and **** header im etc cam make 180 whp. I have yet to see that. But I have seen 160 ish whp on that combo multiple times even 170 ish with all the other goodies

stock b16's with crap ihe dyno what 140-145ish it it's nice and healthy who do you gain 40 WHP from ctr cams......????? let alone a way bigger cams and sweet header I mean 40 whp is alot to gain

Like stated 200 whp is even hard on 1.8l to do

not to mention wasn't omni's a dyno queen..??

and yes I meant 403's on the b20 relax
dingus888 is offline  
Old 14-Apr-2007, 06:43 PM
  #55  
-- site donator --
iTrader: (1)
 
zeeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: the hammer
Posts: 7,040
if you read LEITNER's post you'll see that that b16 that made 180whp had headwork, balanced bottom end, better intake manifold and throttle body, and CTR/ITR cams....so it wasn't a stock block b16.
Headwork is an absolute must to make serious power, same with higher compression, but compression alone won't make an engine super potent. Its part of the equation, but so is combustion chamber shape/size, port shape, how many CFM the head can flow at any given valve lift, the cams you are using, supporting mods, etc etc.
I'm not disagreeing that hitting 180whp will be tough, but not impossible....you better have a budget of $4000+ to get there.
zeeman is offline  
Old 14-Apr-2007, 09:24 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
VTEC_Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Where ever my car is...
Posts: 1,393
Yeah, I dyno'd 140whp with my stock b16 last summer with only a basic SRI.

$4000 for 180whp b16? That include tuning? I think it can be done for less than that.

What all do you need? lets make a hypothetical list of everything necessary and you guys add in the prices (cause I don't know...lol):

-S2s2 cams
-valve springs/retainers
-.030" shaved off the head + port & polishing
-adjustable cam gears (optional???)
-TB or TB and intake manifold
-header (a good one)
-ecu mods (for tuning)
-tuning



....if there is anything I forgot, just throw it on the list.
VTEC_Thunder is offline  
Old 14-Apr-2007, 09:40 PM
  #57  
-- site donator --
iTrader: (1)
 
zeeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: the hammer
Posts: 7,040
ya and add up the cost of all of that stuff.
Dude, trust me, i've got over $4000 into my setup.
Cams - $500
Valvetrain - $400
Headwork - easy $1000
Cam gears - $200
Throttle body - $200 (at least, way more if you go aftermarket)
Intake manifold - $300
Header (good one) - $800+
Ecu mods - $100
Tuning $300-1000

And thats quoting on the low side of things, plus a new headgasket and ARP head studs (which i highly recommend), might as well change the valve seals too while the head is apart.
zeeman is offline  
Old 19-Apr-2007, 10:12 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Nova_Dust's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 18,367
For non VTEC application, Crower 405 will dump lots of fuel due to cam overlapping, so what about 403 or 404? Daily driving approx 30km, weekend off duty with some track use. I really don't care about mileage, that is part of the game.
Nova_Dust is offline  
Old 06-Sep-2007, 12:29 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
Tmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: K-ToWN
Posts: 41
Hey I just pt a Delta 272 in my B7 sohc. It has the usual I/H/E, .40 milled off the head,Y7 ajustable cam gear. I have not got the car tuned. But recently the car is starting to smell like fuel when I punch it. How do I correct this? Would a FPR and gauge help, or shold I try ajusting my A/F ratio? Thank's any help would be aprreciated.
Tmack is offline  
Old 08-Sep-2007, 01:42 PM
  #60  
Registered User
 
SikTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 315
what u guyz think of skunk2 pro 1's?
SikTeg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Warrior Saint
Maintenance
76
30-Jul-2010 07:39 PM
szuberi
Photographer's Corner
121
31-Aug-2008 05:33 PM
Quick_CX
Engine
23
13-May-2004 08:48 AM
maxxspeed
Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion
0
06-Jul-2002 07:43 PM



Quick Reply: Camshaft Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 PM.