2000 PRELUDE VS 2001 Celica
23-Oct-2005, 10:42 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 42
2000 PRELUDE VS 2001 Celica
in the market for a new ride after winter, and after i sell my civic.
Narrowed it down to the 2000 prelude and 2001 celica..got about a 15000$ budget..
it would be the base prelude and the celica gt!
wat do u guys think...i kno the lude is faster without a doubt, but not a huge dealf or me..im more about looks and im really likeing the celi now..
wat should i go for..
plz keep in mine in 20 and insurance is killer, and i think the celi will be a bit less then the lude
Narrowed it down to the 2000 prelude and 2001 celica..got about a 15000$ budget..
it would be the base prelude and the celica gt!
wat do u guys think...i kno the lude is faster without a doubt, but not a huge dealf or me..im more about looks and im really likeing the celi now..
wat should i go for..
plz keep in mine in 20 and insurance is killer, and i think the celi will be a bit less then the lude
23-Oct-2005, 01:28 PM
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,745
Originally posted by JusBlaze
celica is a girls car and even the GTS is slow.
celica is a girls car and even the GTS is slow.
23-Oct-2005, 02:10 PM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North York, Toronto-Downtown, London
Posts: 2,316
i would say LUDE!
unless you're getting the older celica 4wd turbo! hahaha....
but your case is all about looks...
so i would still say LUDE... don't you think LUDE has the more QUICKER look?
i can't say the celi doesn't have the sporty look, but it looks more like a BIG SLOW WIDE TRY-TO-LOOK-MEAN type thing... you know... i wouldn't say its a chick car, but its like a car for people that they feel if the car is wider, bigger, its safer... get what i'm saying?.... the lude's longer looking and more narrow body with its aggressive look... it looks more like you're a cool dude... that's how i feel...
unless you're getting the older celica 4wd turbo! hahaha....
but your case is all about looks...
so i would still say LUDE... don't you think LUDE has the more QUICKER look?
i can't say the celi doesn't have the sporty look, but it looks more like a BIG SLOW WIDE TRY-TO-LOOK-MEAN type thing... you know... i wouldn't say its a chick car, but its like a car for people that they feel if the car is wider, bigger, its safer... get what i'm saying?.... the lude's longer looking and more narrow body with its aggressive look... it looks more like you're a cool dude... that's how i feel...
23-Oct-2005, 03:26 PM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: the suburban ghetto of maple
Posts: 1,736
Originally posted by kwikb16a2
not that slow, 180hp and is the same engine used in the lotus elise (but the elise is light as fawk) Id still take the celica over the prelude because the celica's got a better engine
not that slow, 180hp and is the same engine used in the lotus elise (but the elise is light as fawk) Id still take the celica over the prelude because the celica's got a better engine
23-Oct-2005, 04:15 PM
#16
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 42
Originally posted by kwikb16a2
guy clearly said hes not into speed, thats why i said the celica is better for him. H22 is an a$$ engine if u ask me
guy clearly said hes not into speed, thats why i said the celica is better for him. H22 is an a$$ engine if u ask me
but anyways..
dont u guys agree for a 2000 lude the interior looks lke ***??? like i cant get over it..looks as pathetic as my 1997 ek..
when i look at the celi interior..its much more modern and up with the times..
just my 2 cents
23-Oct-2005, 07:28 PM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,176
you should make a post like this in different forums. Obviously since most of us are honda lovers, we are going to say the prelude.
Both cars are decent.. in the end I would stick with the lude because I don't like how celica's look.
Both cars are decent.. in the end I would stick with the lude because I don't like how celica's look.
