2 fast 2 furious sucks
 

Am I the only person that thought 2 fast 2 furious sucked **** , and would rather drive a stock sunfire than have to watch that shitty ass movie again.

At least it was better than the first one imo. What would you expect from a movie like that?

2 fast 2 furious was alright loved the america muscle cars tho

Re: 2 fast 2 furious sucks
 

LOL! that actually made me laugh..


personally, I thought the first one was ok.. 2f2f was **** tho.

apparently they're workin on a third.

i thought the second one was mediocore... i'd rather have just downloaded it and saved my $10....

when the first one came out i thought it was an amazing movie.... but it opened our world up to way to many people and now look at all the problems that are at least partially caused by that movie

heres my break down of the movie
2f2f way better driving scenes
2f2f sick skyline for 5 mins
fnf more realistic (of the two)
fnf better story line

but acting is a joke and the writers should be slapped for the lines they come up with

Re: Re: 2 fast 2 furious sucks
 

:dito:

2f2f was the worst movie i ever seen with the ugliest cars and bad actors and the worst story line...i liked the first one wayyyyyyyyy better

I liked the second one better.

it was way better than the first one

i dont like the movie
its boring
no feel

they both were fuckgin retarded...cars with wings and body kits and 19 inch rims racing.....ok ya...try gogin to the real runs aroudn nto jsut with 15 sec hondas with real cars....there are dsm's mustangs and gutted hondas with 14's...most look liek **** but are fast....the movies were written by peoepl who have never been to a real street racing venue and are only goging by the gay 16-17 sec cars tehy see driving down the highway boucing around....put soem real life race cars in there then it woud be cool...liek a gutted ls/vtec 4th gen with 14 inch black rims or a 12 sec dsm with faded paint or a mustang with rust and big fat tires on the back rungin a 1/4 not a 240 km/h run or a relay race....:rolleyes: ....the cars are retarded...teh evo they had in the movie barley ran a 15 sec pass....the supra was in the high 14's...no car broke 13's except the yenko even with it's polyglass tires :rolleyes: which have no traction

while this may be true, its probably more general public/average joe marketable to put flashy out there cars in. would you have sat through baywatch without the girls?:shrugs:

Both sucked. You can have nice cars without ugly ass body kits and ****.

The second one was ok, it had a story while the first was all let's race this, let's race that kinda movie.

its juss an cop action movie
it would be better if it wasnt about cop vs racers

would be hype if it juss a pure racing movie
rivals and challenges and crap

i agree with everything except why does a car have to look like **** to be fast? i know plenty of guys with nice looking cars that are reasonably fast, a buddy of mine has a b18 in his ek coupe, with gunmetal 16's, droped, nice body kit and cf hood, car looks wicked.

:haha:

in the movie they seperate reality from dreams sooo much now tell me who the **** has 40g's to blow on parts and all that

haha i agree :haha:

Rich people, obviously.

i agree with u soild dx p.o.s

real racers cars are usually sleepers that look liek crap are gutted to ****...all the money goes into the motor and drivetrain.....a b18 in a ek isnt' really fast...that woudl be a mid 14 sec car...I'm talkign about a 12-11 sec street dsm with 5-8000 in total put into the car...or a raggedy mustang 5.0....that's what is real not 19 inch cromes with play stations and subs and a wing with graphiscs....or a gutted h22 on spray or a built ls/vtec in a 4th gen that is primer grey.....

Street racers make it hard for the restof us to modifiy our cars and be left alone when we don't do anything wrong.
Tkae it to the track I think you can spare the $20.

I liked the second one as well. More variety of rides, hotter chicks :)

I hope you don't mean that Japanese mix... LOL

did anyone pick up the repeatative use of the word "BRO"

:shrugs:

I thought it sucked ass!:fight:

i liked it!...acting was better than the 1st

They were both alright. The second one did have some fugly ass cars in it specially the ugly ass purple one the black dude was driving and the ugly ass actress in the pink s2K.
Not too crazy about the brutal flames from the exhaust. the muscle cars were nice. I agree partially with dingus, the cars they put in the show are brutal and slow with canadian tire hopups attatched to them.
Hopefully they put some nicer quicker cars in the next one, but I doubt that will happen. The scene has gotten soo brutal and ricey in the past year or 2, plus the addition of the fast and the furious movies, im pretty much out of it, not the same as 2 years ago thats for sure

:dito:

actually it was "bra":rolleyes:

dont forget Paul Walker reminding us how white he really is with the line "I said forget about it cos!"

All in all I liked the movie but it did have its unrealistic moments....anyone have 35 large to drop on a race? And how about spraying Nos while jumping a bridge?

Other than that, race scenes were way better.....and a car doesnt have to be rusted and primered ro be fast....your car can be nice too....

You can't blame the movie......it's the people behind the steering wheel that's the problem.

What is a guy going to say to a cop or a judge?

:rolleyes: :richslap: :smoker:

what gets me pissed is the technical innaccuracies. and the huge chrome rims, and in 2f2f they were flyin on the freeway and the speedo said 100 mph. lame. fnf had better story, but the technical aspects suked ass.

worst line in fnf- JaRule- " ya know, one of tha things we knows is, its not how yu stand by ya car, its how ya race your car"
GOD I HATE THAT!

worst line in 2f2f- Brian- " what engine would be better for muh skyline? a Gallo's 12 or a Gallo's 24?............. i didnt know pizza places made motors!
JESUS THAT ONE IS SO LAME!

Re: 2 fast 2 furious sucks
 

The cars and acting sucked...

Muscle cars!

The acting was so bad, at times, the screenplay ground to a halt, especially Tyrese. Man, that was dire:cry:

Meh

:)

Everyone has their own personal tastes.

i likeed it. i feel it had a better story line to it and a little more action but to much cg

it was realistic when they jumped the bridge ............... not

why do movies have to be all about realizm:shurgs: like a movie is supposed to capture your imagination, and leave reality for 1 or 2 hours...

If i wanted realisim, I would watch boaring documentrys or hell just do a normal day.... I hate it when people complain about movies not being "realistic" :rolleyes:

I thought it was entertaining, music, flash, girls... lots of creative customized cars... I guess people are just cynical, and have to look for all the bad in things, ahwell thats life i guess....

Crap, I forgot about the broads, A :thumbup: for all the hotties they threw in 2 fast 2 furious

movies that are realistic captuer you mroe cause it can actually happen you could do it if you really wanted to...the least they codul have done woudl be to do teh played otu JDM thing and have all the cars on knockoff old school rims' ...or spoon resplica's...but nope they have the essence of everythign wrong with the "scene" today....and the scene changed low befoer 2 years ago...liek 3-4 years ago it instanly turned gay...:cool: ...I mean have soem real life cars run a quater mile and nto jump a bridge and not be hard with the "streets" livin a "thug life"...show soem launches liek a sweet awd launch that smoek all four tires....they need better racign footage..**** give me teh camera and they wodul atleast ahve good driving and racign shots...what abotu barckgin secodn adn third gear sounds...stuff leiik that woudl help alot...and take out the NOS buttons..:rolleyes:

i liked the 2nd one better because the first one was really pissing me off with the unrealistic street racing scene...although the 2nd one was the same...it wasnt about the racing as much so it was decent.

hey now whatever has hot men and hot cars...I can stand to watch...