CFz Discussion Club discussions, Civic talk, and general automotive info not covered by a sub-forum.

06 SI... thought it had a little more under the hood...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20-Aug-2006, 11:24 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
imported_viper_2_4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Somewhere out there...
Posts: 4,606
Originally posted by DumbasSi
My point is that the person looking at a new Civic is not the same person looking for an old one. Apples to oranges.
Thats true, good correction.....your previous post made you look ignorant

----

I would suspect high 14s and low 15s realistic.....remember the new civics are a lot heavier than a 16 year old civic (with essentially no safety equipment)
imported_viper_2_4 is offline  
Old 20-Aug-2006, 11:34 PM
  #22  
-- site donator --
 
DumbasSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,647
Besides the original poster was comparing a swapped Civic to a stock one. I'm sure a turbo or swapped Si would make short work of anything with a B16 in it.

I didnt buy the car because of its speed, or lack thereof compared to other cars. It is a great all-around package. Its the handling that I'm most impressed by.
DumbasSi is offline  
Old 21-Aug-2006, 12:27 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
project.mu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sauga da 905
Posts: 353
Originally posted by mugenpowered
People in this thread are posting a range of numbers as low as low 14's as high as mid 16's.
Considering that Motor Trend said 14.9 and Road & Track said 15.0, (both of which are pretty reputable because they use good drivers and accurate equipment for their tests) I would think it is high 14s-low 15s.
Hard to say exactly because there are so many factors.
depending on the drivers, yes, the high 14 - low 15 seems very resonable to me, its a STOCK car, with full interior, stock exhaust and header.

the Si motor, has alot more potential with a quality header(DTR or HyTech), Bigger T/B, Some Cams, and Springs and a Reflash(K-Pro)

those boltons can make the car 230whp+
project.mu is offline  
Old 21-Aug-2006, 12:53 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
markpa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Durham Region
Posts: 161
Originally posted by DumbasSi
Besides the original poster was comparing a swapped Civic to a stock one. I'm sure a turbo or swapped Si would make short work of anything with a B16 in it.
turbo that b16 and Youll have no chance....Its all about what your goals are, and your budget.
markpa2 is offline  
Old 21-Aug-2006, 08:25 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
imported_kungfugrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,087
half of u guys dont even track... so i wouldnt be talkin track numbers like u freakin know what ur car would run
imported_kungfugrip is offline  
Old 21-Aug-2006, 08:49 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Cynikal.Mindset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,881
I know I got my old 4th gen Si to do a 15.8 full interior 1/2 tank of gas on sh*t general tires w/ mad wheel hop
Cynikal.Mindset is offline  
Old 21-Aug-2006, 11:39 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
97SiR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 1,461
Originally posted by Cynikal.Mindset
I know I got my old 4th gen Si to do a 15.8 full interior 1/2 tank of gas on sh*t general tires w/ mad wheel hop
Impressive! I can only imagine what you can do with the new Si.
97SiR is offline  
Old 22-Aug-2006, 01:08 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
VTEC_Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Where ever my car is...
Posts: 1,393
Re: 06 SI... thought it had a little more under the hood...

Originally posted by mikepasini


Top speed : 145 mph(estimated)
0-60 mph : 7.2 sec.
0-¼ mile : 15.6 sec @ 93.0 mph
60-0 braking distance : 125 ft(estimated)
200 ft skidpad : 0.85 g(estimated)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^thats it?
I dyno'd 140whp and 101ft-lbs @ the wheels and ran 15.6 in the 1/4 mile in slippery damp conditions this spring at st.thomas (i have the time slip to prove it) with a basically stock b16 (2000 SiR) (SR intake and axle back exhaust).

I thought for sure the new si would be quicker than that...

I still like em tho.......so much potential.
VTEC_Thunder is offline  
Old 22-Aug-2006, 01:12 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
VTEC_Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Where ever my car is...
Posts: 1,393
Also measured almost the same .84g cornering on cheezy snow tires in my em1 with the gtech pro. Also measured 0-60 times in the mid to high 6seconds....


But then the new SI is heavier....


I expected more of the new si, to be honest.
VTEC_Thunder is offline  
Old 23-Aug-2006, 10:06 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
imported_kumanan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 838
14s... pssh... i think with all the **** in my 03 civic i run liek 20s or something...dumb heavy chrome rims. they weigh like 80++ lbs each
imported_kumanan is offline  
Old 27-Aug-2006, 09:04 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
bren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 93
ya, hasnt anyone really looked at the weight of the car?

its over 3000 lbs with a driver! even a small driver!

for those of us who have been racing hondas for years, we know that weight is everything. though the stock output is fantastic, and the potential for the motor is incredible... the curb weight is what is slowing it down.

a 2000lb b16 EF with 150 whp will take down a 3000lb Si with 200whp by quite a bit. 1000 lb of weight is a HUGE difference. not to bash the new Si, i love it. i want one, but it should not be considered in the class of the weekend racer. as my car sits now it weighs 2600lb with me in it, and i just couldnt go any higher than that.

bren
bren is offline  
Old 27-Aug-2006, 12:01 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
civicnation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,266
weight is the biggest problem. the new civics are ugly as hell too so why so much offense taken?
civicnation is offline  
Old 27-Aug-2006, 03:03 PM
  #33  
-- site donator --
 
DumbasSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,647
Its still lighter then its main competition the Cobalt SS and a new GTI, which at 3300lbs is a real pig.

It is a heavy car, but all the things Honda has added to it make it heavier then past models. Its not really an econo-box anymore.

Ugly is a relative term. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.
DumbasSi is offline  
Old 27-Aug-2006, 03:35 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
WankelWanker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Somewhere between 2nd and 3rd gear...
Posts: 106
The new Si is fun to drive but, by no means fast and shouldn't be looked at as a good competitor stock...on the other hand, who takes a complete stock car to the races? With that in mind, it has a lot of potential but, comparatively speaking with other vehicles of comparable weight, the new Si ranks pretty low.
WankelWanker is offline  
Old 27-Aug-2006, 04:56 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Chigga1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: H-town YOOOO
Posts: 3,079
blah those are stats you are reading....i would love to slap that motor in my SIR!!!

and like someone said, with the some bolt-ons and ecu reflash... im sure that the motor is really underrated!

damn VTEC THUNDER!!!
i should dyno mine... with my bolt-ons im pretty confident i could slap this ride in the 14's

i havent hit the track in over 2 years
Chigga1 is offline  
Old 27-Aug-2006, 06:13 PM
  #36  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
imported_mikepasini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: mississauga
Posts: 1,607
Originally posted by Chigga1
blah those are stats you are reading....i would love to slap that motor in my SIR!!!

and like someone said, with the some bolt-ons and ecu reflash... im sure that the motor is really underrated!

damn VTEC THUNDER!!!
i should dyno mine... with my bolt-ons im pretty confident i could slap this ride in the 14's

i havent hit the track in over 2 years
the motor is not underated... the car is because of the weight... and no **** you would love to throw that into your SIR because the motor you have is underpowered for the car you drive (just like the new SI)... like everyone says if it were lighter it would be faster... your SIR is like a 1000lbs lighter than the new SI... we all know K-series kick *** and there is no woman I have ever met that is worth slamming over that tranny from 5th to 6th.
imported_mikepasini is offline  
Old 27-Aug-2006, 07:02 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
bbor-imported's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North York,Ontario
Posts: 2,544
Funny thing is ef WITH B16 IS ALOT MORE FUN TO DRIVE!

EF's with b16 > 06 Si

bbor-imported is offline  
Old 27-Aug-2006, 10:03 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Chigga1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: H-town YOOOO
Posts: 3,079
true and true!!

but what makes the SI and SIR so awesome is, i didnt have to swap the motor into my car!! HAHAHAHA

from factory baby.... and whats even better is HONDA always made it a 2 year production! Acura on the other hand was different! with the GSR and the R
Chigga1 is offline  
Old 28-Aug-2006, 05:49 AM
  #39  
Junior Member
 
imported_FlashPoint-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ajax (Home) / North York (Work)
Posts: 26
Originally posted by mugenpowered
People in this thread are posting a range of numbers as low as low 14's as high as mid 16's.
Considering that Motor Trend said 14.9 and Road & Track said 15.0, (both of which are pretty reputable because they use good drivers and accurate equipment for their tests) I would think it is high 14s-low 15s.
Hard to say exactly because there are so many factors.
I have to agree with you on that point
imported_FlashPoint-Matt is offline  
Old 29-Aug-2006, 02:07 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
imported_RRRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 234
I run a B20Vtec CRX and ran against a stock 06 Civic Si at a track in Quebec. I had to follow it a few laps and pass in a braking zone. I had the car in the corner no problem, but could not get enough speed to even pull next to it in the straights. Have to say I was thoroughly impressed with the pull on that thing. Race suspension and R-compounds and I'd never be able to catch up to the thing, much less pass it.
imported_RRRex is offline  


Quick Reply: 06 SI... thought it had a little more under the hood...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:16 AM.