Official Photographer's Thread
 

Here's a few pic's i've taken well out crusin.

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f3...f/100_2002.jpg

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f3...Picture013.jpg

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f3...f/100_1887.jpg

A couple pics from my recent trip to B.C.!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...c/IMG_1431.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...c/IMG_1547.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...c/IMG_1721.jpg

Love this shot!

i agree....lovely colors

a few that I had posted on the other boards, more pictures to come from a recent photoshoot

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1070/...734a8634_o.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1318/...6f4b5a83_o.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1163/...e0f06912_o.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1037/...5fb9a1c4_o.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1210/...1b1a9a87_o.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1333/...3f4f8ef1_o.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1262/...30d1d4cf_o.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1264/...963b069d_o.jpg

kev...nice pics..and i can see you like to play with contrast settings :-)

haha i do, those are all straight from the cam, except crop + watermark, and for the last one with the guy where i just desaturated it.

aha i see....i guess you shot these using the nifty fifty? man that lens shines everytime (except low light sometimes) but in my experience of using it...its pretty dependable at f1.8 and i guess sharpest at around f5.6 or so.

i wanna get a nice and fast tele as my next lens and doing some research atm. i really dig the 70-200mm F4L IS

some shots taken with the nifty fifty at a car show some time back...i wish i could do more of this...

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1222/...b48d46cddd.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1060/...66c0cbd1f9.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1332/...175a7d3ffe.jpg

those are all with the tamron 17-50 f/2.8. i rarely use the 50mm now, as 98% of my shoots i need wide angle. I'm currently pending on the canon 10-22mm f/2.5-4.5, the Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 L, or the Sigma 12-24 f/4.5-5.6. I'm also piecing together my strobist kit, but the damn wireless flash-sync's are like $300 USD for the pair! garrr, damn the photo bug!

Both you guys are lucky that you have the Tamron 17-50. It's not offered in my mount, I'd have to settle for the Sigma 24-70 or the Tamron 28-75.

yup...i love the tamron...its so dependable...here is a shot taken at the zoo recently. i wish i could have tried a bit more to get rid of the cage from the composition.

i was standing a bit far from the edge so i shot at 40-50mm but then had to crop it to bring the tiger closer...hence some minor grain in the pic but overall...i love the picture. The magnificent sumatran tiger.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1358/...a3804150_b.jpg

the original image as i shot it

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1389/...d7d24a26_b.jpg

I'm sorry, but what's so special about this one? You should have removed the people's feet from the shot.

If i were to remove the person's feet, it would crop it too far, thus taking away the wide angle look. I'm sorry that you don't think it's special, but I liked it, so I posted it up. simple as that.

awsome picture. i wanted to make it into a HDR. so here
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/6467/bluelh1.jpg
im gona put it into the HDR thread K?

thread moved to "Photographer's Corner"