Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion Engine tech, forced induction, springs, shocks, brakes, tires, etc.

what springs???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-Feb-2005, 01:55 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
imported_JDMman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North York
Posts: 2,254
what springs???

i need some opinions on these springs??? what do you have to say about them??? which are best???



TEIN S TECH








NEUSPEED SPORT SPRINGS







TENZO R LOWERING SPRINGS







SKUNK 2 LOWERING SPRINGS







H&R SPORT LOWERING SPRINGS








Any info would help.... thanx
imported_JDMman is offline  
Old 05-Feb-2005, 10:50 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
imported_D dot T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,506
I would say H&R sport which I have a set myself and like very much but the teins' are very good as well I heard. The thing is the drops for those springs listed are different. For example, H&R is 1.75/1.5 and Tein is 2.3/2.0 I believe.
imported_D dot T is offline  
Old 05-Feb-2005, 10:51 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
imported_D dot T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,506
Eibach is also a good one to go for, pro kit for a mild drop 1.5/1.2
imported_D dot T is offline  
Old 05-Feb-2005, 11:23 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
cibs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 13,184
H&R has a nicer stance in my opinion, my first springs were eibachs, and if i ever switch back to springs i'd go H&R
cibs is offline  
Old 05-Feb-2005, 02:02 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
dingus88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,431
I"d go H&R sports, S tech have big drop and so do skunks which have big spring rates if I'm not mistaken
dingus88 is offline  
Old 05-Feb-2005, 02:15 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
scarlemthug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Scarborough and Mississauga
Posts: 7,065
im pretty sure the Teins are only like 1.8 front and 1.7 in the rear as far as drop. The teins are designed more for performance and stock shocks than having a huge drop. If you want to have a nice drop go with H&R's
scarlemthug is offline  
Old 05-Feb-2005, 06:09 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
imported_GoldBadge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 3,474
Spring Rates from the Performance Archives...

http://www.torontocivics.com/tccforu...threadid=47340
imported_GoldBadge is offline  
Old 05-Feb-2005, 09:30 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
1niceSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Starbucks
Posts: 2,688
Satisfied H&R customer here.
1niceSi is offline  
Old 07-Feb-2005, 03:04 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
lotusvale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: T.Dot
Posts: 219
height drop tein s tech on civic



great ride because of the less spring rate. performance is better than stock but still got some body roll a little bit. anyway, it runs fine for me since i don't really do any auto-x ing anyway.
lotusvale is offline  
Old 07-Feb-2005, 03:05 PM
  #10  
-- site donator --
iTrader: (2)
 
bbarbulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: not Toronto
Posts: 27,687
nice stance!!
bbarbulo is offline  
Old 07-Feb-2005, 03:54 PM
  #11  
-- site donator --
 
DumbasSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,647
Originally posted by bbarbulo
nice stance!!
Is it me, or does the back look lower?

H&R Sports
DumbasSi is offline  
Old 08-Feb-2005, 01:30 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
lotusvale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: T.Dot
Posts: 219
Originally posted by bbarbulo
nice stance!!
thanks. sorry man..i'm still trying to take the pic of the bumpstop. last time when they take out the wheel, forgot to bring my camera.
lotusvale is offline  
Old 08-Feb-2005, 01:30 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
lotusvale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: T.Dot
Posts: 219
Originally posted by DumbasSi

Is it me, or does the back look lower?

H&R Sports
no. the back is actually higher. it's probably the pic or the road surface not flat enough.
lotusvale is offline  
Old 08-Feb-2005, 01:44 AM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
imported_JDMman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North York
Posts: 2,254
Originally posted by DumbasSi

Is it me, or does the back look lower?

H&R Sports

the back looks higher to me...

i think im gonna go with the h&r springs..... seems like alot of people are suggestin them so i think thats what im gonna go with... thanx for the help guys
imported_JDMman is offline  
Old 08-Feb-2005, 01:48 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
lotusvale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: T.Dot
Posts: 219
yep. h&r is a good spring. but i'd suggest you get the shocks as well, since this spring has higher rates for performance and because of that purpose, you'd need better shocks than the stock one.
my friend used h&r sports + stock shocks on his rsx-s, and he tried bring it to the track. i was in the passenger side, the car felt like almost turned over. lots of body roll there. so yea just my 0.2
lotusvale is offline  
Old 08-Feb-2005, 02:21 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
imported_Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: .......
Posts: 4,572
progress anyone? theyre great
imported_Joker is offline  
Old 08-Feb-2005, 06:58 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
imported_gatherer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: on a race track
Posts: 17,846
does not matter
imported_gatherer is offline  
Old 08-Feb-2005, 02:01 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
imported_sane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 373
Originally posted by GoldBadge
Spring Rates from the Performance Archives...

http://www.torontocivics.com/tccforu...threadid=47340
has anyone noticed the difference in rates between stock and aftermarket for the REARS??

the fronts are pretty close, but the rears' rates get incredibly high. just strange that the % difference is so great.

for example:

99-00 Si (EM1) 201P 99.8P
H&R Sport 330P 280P

for the fronts it's like a 1/3rd stiffer, and the rears are 2x stiffer!

why is that? the same pretty much holds for all springs in this list... ?

another interesting find: look at the glaring difference between koni's rsk kit and tokico's illumina kit. it seems as if the illumina setup would be way more comfortable:

99-00 Si (EM1) 201P 99.8P
Tokico Illumina Kit 250P 123P
Koni RSK Suspension kit 154-205P 270L

that linear 270 in the rear for the koni's looks like a literal pain in the *** too...
imported_sane is offline  
Old 08-Feb-2005, 02:10 PM
  #19  
-- site donator --
iTrader: (2)
 
bbarbulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: not Toronto
Posts: 27,687
springs in the rear get bumped quite high to help with the FF tendancy to understeer. understeer is good for the average joe driver, but when you are good, you want closer to neutral balance, and the way to get that is to get really high rear rates. Note that the Realtime Integra Type R runs ~800 lbs front springs and 1000 lbs rear springs!!!! Yeah, the rear is HIGHER than the front on most FF race cars to help with rotation.
bbarbulo is offline  
Old 08-Feb-2005, 02:28 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
imported_sane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 373
i gather FF = front wheel drive cars?

oh well. consider me your 'average joe' driver, esp. considering wifey drives the car sometimes - and she's already bitching me out for putting neuspeed race springs on the car (hahah)

i like driving my car hard sometimes but in my older years i think i'm leaning more towards ride comfort.

looks like i'm headed for the illumina's!
imported_sane is offline  


Quick Reply: what springs???



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 PM.