CFz Discussion Club discussions, Civic talk, and general automotive info not covered by a sub-forum.

Good read re: Street Racing by Jim Kenzie in today's Star

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-Jun-2006, 03:21 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Capo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North York/Oshawa
Posts: 469
Originally posted by starboy869
"but the cops just want to make money from modders... i wouldn't mind giving them money if they can keep the gunshots rate lower"

If your car mods aren't against the HTA set by the province and not the police then you won't get a ticket.

I sick & tired of people seeing this as a cash grab for the police, which it really isn't.
people complaining has alot to do with getting harrased more than getting a ticket. If a cop sees a modded car they will stop you and hassle you about everything and still may not give you a ticket but they will waste your time (time = money) and sometimes threaten to check up on you in a week. Also with alot of laws its "up to the officers discretion" meaning if they are in a bad mood they can give u a ticket even if there isnt anything illegal with your car. Then you have to take the time to take it to court and deal with it.
Capo is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 03:35 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
imported_mugenpowered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North York
Posts: 1,148
Re: Re: Good read re: Street Racing by Jim Kenzie in today's Star

Originally posted by ROBB


Civics arent built to go as fast as a Porsche.
A Porsche is built to go that fast. And it has the safety to back it up.

My crx + civic speedo tops out at 200 kph, whereas a Porsche tops out at what 320 kph ?
there's a reason for that...

Doing 140 in a civic is like doing 280 in a porsche
Period.
I think his point is that there is no need to profile one more than the other. On the basis that either way the highest speed limit in Ontario is 100km/h and both cars are perfectly safe at that speed.
Speeding is not relative, it doesn't matter if doing 140 in a Civic is like doing 280 in a Porsche, or 310 in a Ferrari, or 105 in a Smart car. Either way the car should not be blamed, it should be the driver who pushes it to an illegal level of speed.

(and on another note, with extensive brake and suspension upgrades a Civic can be "built to go fast" too)
imported_mugenpowered is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 04:13 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
marker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 354
Originally posted by mugenpowered
I definitely agree with this article, it's not that street racing isn't a problem, it's just that it is being blown way out of proportion.

Is it really getting blown out of proportion? Let's ask the latest innocent victims to be hit by a street racer. Fortunately they survived this time around, even though the racer did not.

http://www.pulse24.com/News/Top_Stor...4-002/page.asp
marker is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 04:47 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
imported_starboy869's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CFB Petawawa
Posts: 2,207
Can you explain how you can get a ticket for something when nothing is illegal with your car?

Soup can exhaust on your civic?
imported_starboy869 is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 04:54 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
imported_mugenpowered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North York
Posts: 1,148
Originally posted by marker



Is it really getting blown out of proportion? Let's ask the latest innocent victims to be hit by a street racer. Fortunately they survived this time around, even though the racer did not.

http://www.pulse24.com/News/Top_Stor...4-002/page.asp

If you would have read/quoted the entire paragraph in my post (rather than one sentence of it) then you would see that my point is not that the loss of innocent lives in car accidents is blown out of proportion, but that the role street racing has to play in these accidents can be blown out of proportion. There is no proof that the first accident was street racing, yet it becomes synonmous with it. The aspect of a high speed crash automatically equating street racing was what I was referring to as being blown out of proportion. I was not referring to the consequences and seriousness of incidents that actually are the result of street racing.
imported_mugenpowered is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 06:13 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Nova_Dust's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 18,367
If you are a speeder, you will speed in anything.
Nova_Dust is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 06:16 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
marker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 354
Originally posted by mugenpowered



If you would have read/quoted the entire paragraph in my post (rather than one sentence of it) then you would see that my point is not that the loss of innocent lives in car accidents is blown out of proportion, but that the role street racing has to play in these accidents can be blown out of proportion. There is no proof that the first accident was street racing, yet it becomes synonmous with it. The aspect of a high speed crash automatically equating street racing was what I was referring to as being blown out of proportion. I was not referring to the consequences and seriousness of incidents that actually are the result of street racing.
That first accident didn't "automatically" get equated with street racing. A multitude of evidence including first-hand witness evidence paved the way to label street racing as a suspected factor in that crash.

Yes, many people do die or get injured in accidents where street racing is not a factor, but you'll have to excuse me if I treat overt acts of driving malfeasance, such as impaired, racing, or overly aggressive driving to great extremes, as issues that need more attention given to them.

These types of driving behaviours are not simple acts of carelessness or incompetence, but wilful and overt decisions to drive in a manner known to pose unacceptabel risk to others on the road. I want the police to go after the wilfuly dangerous drivers first. We can go after the poor drivers later.
marker is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 06:28 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
imported_WyseGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Markham
Posts: 185
Re: Good read re: Street Racing by Jim Kenzie in today's Star

Originally posted by lowblackdub

But we have to attack the largest problem areas first, not the mosquito bites.

Klees, and Ontario's new transportation minister, Donna Cansfield, should get on with tougher driving tests, higher standards for driver education and stronger enforcement of truly dangerous driving behaviour.

And I don't mean speed traps on open highways.
word. i read this article at work yesterday and there's nothing more true than that.
imported_WyseGuy is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 10:29 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
imported_mugenpowered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North York
Posts: 1,148
Originally posted by marker


That first accident didn't "automatically" get equated with street racing. A multitude of evidence including first-hand witness evidence paved the way to label street racing as a suspected factor in that crash.

Yes, many people do die or get injured in accidents where street racing is not a factor, but you'll have to excuse me if I treat overt acts of driving malfeasance, such as impaired, racing, or overly aggressive driving to great extremes, as issues that need more attention given to them.

These types of driving behaviours are not simple acts of carelessness or incompetence, but wilful and overt decisions to drive in a manner known to pose unacceptabel risk to others on the road. I want the police to go after the wilfuly dangerous drivers first. We can go after the poor drivers later.
I guess we can agree to disagree on that too, because in my opinion it is best to go after the biggest problems first. To me the state of mind is not as important as it obviously is to you, in that whether the person is consciously driving in an unsafe manner (or is doing so unconsciously as a result of incompetence) it doesn't matter as much as the end result. IMO, just look at the bottom line and first address the problem that causes the most injuries and deaths (regardless of the intentions behind it), don't put it on the back burner just because it is not a conscious action.
imported_mugenpowered is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 10:29 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Capo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North York/Oshawa
Posts: 469
Originally posted by starboy869
Can you explain how you can get a ticket for something when nothing is illegal with your car?

Soup can exhaust on your civic?
you can get a ticket for example "being too low" if the cop feels in his discretion your car is too low even if it isnt too low that its illegal. one day you will have an experience which will make you understand, i can tell you this because i used to feel the same way.
Capo is offline  
Old 04-Jun-2006, 10:36 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Notorious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 15,801
Good find! It was well written.
Notorious is offline  
Old 05-Jun-2006, 12:22 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Chigga1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: H-town YOOOO
Posts: 3,079
Re: Re: Re: Good read re: Street Racing by Jim Kenzie in today's Star

Originally posted by t_dot_SiR



but the cops just want to make money from modders... i wouldn't mind giving them money if they can keep the gunshots rate lower
^^^^ true statement!!!
Chigga1 is offline  
Old 05-Jun-2006, 10:38 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
imported_Moe_Mentum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North East
Posts: 2,578
Originally posted by starboy869
"but the cops just want to make money from modders... i wouldn't mind giving them money if they can keep the gunshots rate lower"

If your car mods aren't against the HTA set by the province and not the police then you won't get a ticket.

I sick & tired of people seeing this as a cash grab for the police, which it really isn't.
I don't agree that cops are pulling over modders as a cash grab, if anything we are being wrongly pulled over by means of stereotyping. I would like to believe that if I have no mods against the HTA I won't get a ticket, but this is highly untrue. Not only do I get pulled over, but I've have had to fight ridiculous tickets for improper this, and that when I know that everything on my car is legal. As much as I would like to argue this at the time of the ticket, it only makes things worse. I just shut my mouth and waste my time taking it to court and watching it get thrown out.

Back on topic, I was really impressed by this article and I do wrote him to give him some positive support.
imported_Moe_Mentum is offline  
Old 05-Jun-2006, 10:46 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
imported_Moe_Mentum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North East
Posts: 2,578
Originally posted by starboy869
Can you explain how you can get a ticket for something when nothing is illegal with your car?

Soup can exhaust on your civic?
Basically you are getting ticketed incorrectly, the ticket never holds up but the fact is you still get the ticket and have to fight it. Some of the things I've been ticketed incorrectly for are Muffler, tail lights, lowering, tint.
imported_Moe_Mentum is offline  
Old 05-Jun-2006, 11:07 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Cynikal.Mindset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,881
Originally posted by cho
all i can say is.. dont blame the car blame the stupid drivers!
and what do majority of "stupid" younger drivers drive? civics/golfs/neons etc which are the "targeted" vehicles...so really the cars arent being blamed, the people are...but the cars have to be driven by somebody, they dont drive themselves
Cynikal.Mindset is offline  
Old 05-Jun-2006, 06:02 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
xplicit r34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,241
definitly a good read and argument
xplicit r34 is offline  
Old 05-Jun-2006, 11:44 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
EG333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 38
I agree with kenzie's article but whats it going to take for these idiots to stop racing on the streets.

Its these young punk idiots with their stock motors and a couple of bolt-on's that think their the fastest thing on the road, that are ruining it for everyone.

What's it going to take for these idiots to stop street racing? Another "street racing" article or how about ten more articles.

For all you young punks that don't realize it yet, I encourage you to keep doing what you're doing cause I don't think you guys will learn 'til something happens to you.

And guys...FAST AND FURIOUS IS JUST A F'N MOVIE?!?!?!
EG333 is offline  
Old 06-Jun-2006, 08:51 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
imported_alwaysoverkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,498
I really think its only a matter of time until insurance will completely refuse to insure a modded car and going behind their back will cause the policy to be void.

Its already very close to this now, but more and more street racing crashes and deaths means more payouts for insurance. If the family had a 250,000 life insurance policy on each person, there is 500,000, now add the cars could be another 10,000 or 20,000. Thats a large payout. now assume that family had 500,000 each life insurance, thats a 1 million dollar payout. They are already saying we won't cover modded cars...but somehow people are running around racing them, so soon they will make it illegal or void the policy all together. So if you crash, your ****ed and you could be sued for the pain and suffer, death, etc. I'd like to see these little ricers work for 20 years to pay off a debt from a lawsuit, haha. Now thats justice.

When these idiots ruin it for the rest of us, that B16 swap will become a paperweight. Its already going in that direction now and in another 5 years I wouldn't be at all surprised to see it being a reality.

This is the reason I sold my lightly modded EL and will be buying a bike. Its a fast enjoyable vehicle stock that still gets good gas mileage and is enjoyable. no hassles from cops or insurance.
imported_alwaysoverkill is offline  
Old 06-Jun-2006, 10:44 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
imported_Moe_Mentum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North East
Posts: 2,578
Its been said before.. Street Racing will never stop. Doesn't matter how much you try to cram it into the heads of the ignorant racers. Theres no point it saying your going to eliminate it completely that's just not realisitic at all. Its going to happen even if the punishment is life! (in which case sometimes it is) If these people are dumb enough to risk their lives what makes you think they care about any kind of law?
imported_Moe_Mentum is offline  
Old 06-Jun-2006, 11:24 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
marker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 354
Originally posted by Moe_Mentum
Its been said before.. Street Racing will never stop. Doesn't matter how much you try to cram it into the heads of the ignorant racers. Theres no point it saying your going to eliminate it completely that's just not realisitic at all. Its going to happen even if the punishment is life! (in which case sometimes it is) If these people are dumb enough to risk their lives what makes you think they care about any kind of law?

Murder and rape will never stop either, no matter how draconian the penalty.

Does that mean we should not do everything we can to stop such deliberate-chosen bad acts that can have such severe impact on innocent lives?
marker is offline  


Quick Reply: Good read re: Street Racing by Jim Kenzie in today's Star



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:07 AM.