Intakes - Headers - Exhausts Tech questions about complete exhaust systems

how much power loss with 3" exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-Nov-2012, 09:27 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Squeegen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Barrie / Canada
Posts: 34
how much power loss with 3" exhaust

Hey guys, I know and 3" exhaust isnt the best choice for a N\A b series but I got a mint 3" cat back for when I installed my turbo on my B18c1 thats going in soon but not having a huge budget and my tranny needed a bearing kit I desided to rebuilt my tranny to a sick 4.9 final drive race tranny with kazz lsd so turbo isnt the best idea now plus i just bought a house so my car play moneys pretty much gone now.

So how much power will I lose if I stick with my 3" exhaust, my motor will have all the parts for my b16 plus some more which are a cold air intake, jdm Mugen type r headers 2.5" outlet, a new AEBS gsr intake manifold ported to 68mm, skunk2 68mm throttle body, fuel pressure reg, aem fuel rail(if the b16a 1 is sized for the b18c motor), adjustable cam gears, chipped p28 with a new tune.

Will I get enough back pressure with the 2.5 header outlet, 2.5" test pipe and then 3" catback to an N1 style muffler?
Squeegen is offline  
Old 18-Nov-2012, 10:52 PM
  #2  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Squeegen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Barrie / Canada
Posts: 34
bump
Squeegen is offline  
Old 19-Nov-2012, 01:48 PM
  #3  
Admin
 
Adair's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Observation Deck
Posts: 17,528
Things sometimes run a little slower here, so please be patient ...hopefully someone will be able to give you the info you're looking for.
Adair is offline  
Old 28-Nov-2012, 11:19 AM
  #4  
Member
 
EF.Hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 58
I can't say numbers because I never dynoed. But, I had a 2.5" on my B16 however preferred to drive straight header. I lost enough torque to notice but I gained enough top end power to notice. Your 3" should be similar to me driving straight header. Just make sure you have enough back pressure so the reversion effect don't happen.


Also a short ram is your best friend in the higher rpms. I eventually put the air filter directly on the TB. This combo of open exhaust and filter on TB made my 90hatch pull like a raped ape high end. I mean supercharged cobalts had trouble. Given I had no power out of VTEC but totally worth it.

My philosophy is why try to add power where you have none to begin with add to what you have. In other words why bother with low end when honda's have none to begin with add to the high end time better spent.

I hope this helps. Just wish I had dynoes.
EF.Hatch is offline  
Old 08-Jan-2013, 09:06 AM
  #5  
MPR
Inactive
 
MPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Where my car is.
Posts: 5,460
Originally Posted by Squeegen
Hey guys, I know and 3" exhaust isnt the best choice for a N\A b series but I got a mint 3" cat back for when I installed my turbo on my B18c1 thats going in soon but not having a huge budget and my tranny needed a bearing kit I desided to rebuilt my tranny to a sick 4.9 final drive race tranny with kazz lsd so turbo isnt the best idea now plus i just bought a house so my car play moneys pretty much gone now.

So how much power will I lose if I stick with my 3" exhaust, my motor will have all the parts for my b16 plus some more which are a cold air intake, jdm Mugen type r headers 2.5" outlet, a new AEBS gsr intake manifold ported to 68mm, skunk2 68mm throttle body, fuel pressure reg, aem fuel rail(if the b16a 1 is sized for the b18c motor), adjustable cam gears, chipped p28 with a new tune.

Will I get enough back pressure with the 2.5 header outlet, 2.5" test pipe and then 3" catback to an N1 style muffler?
There's actually no such thing as "back pressure". There is rather, an optimal flow velocity which helps scavenge exhaust gases from the combustion chamber. The larger diameter the piping, the higher rpm that optimal scavenging will occur.

Long story short, where do you want the power? If you still want some decent mid-range power along with top-end, then go with 2.5" piping. If you only want peak power and no mid-range, go with 3".

IMO, useable power is always better than peak power. Having no power below 5000rpm on the street will suck.

Good luck.
MPR is offline  
Old 08-Jan-2013, 10:35 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Squeegen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Barrie / Canada
Posts: 34
thanks for the info guy thats pretty much what i thought. I want as much low to mid range as I can get I for autocross on those tight corners so I should go 2.5, i do have a really short geared tranny to help with that but still..... so anyone want to trade a mint 3" exhaust for a 2.5" lol, i live an hour north of Toronto.
Squeegen is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
99CivicSiR
Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion
9
06-Apr-2009 09:02 PM
white92d15b7
Chit-Chat
17
03-Feb-2005 09:12 PM
imported_corcoran_chris
Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion
6
07-Sep-2003 08:41 PM
Quick_CX
Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion
7
06-May-2003 03:44 PM
PHAT SIR
Honda Civic Performance - JDM Discussion
3
12-Jul-2002 06:22 PM



Quick Reply: how much power loss with 3" exhaust



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 PM.